Early Years Rant 3

(So if this was a movie, I’d entitle it Early Years: The Rant Continues……!)
 
Do have a read through my original piece on this topic and then the follow-up. There have been many wonderful contributions by readers as well – which I am so grateful for. It is incredibly helpful for others who feel isolated or even persecuted for their beliefs about keeping their children home to have a place to go to read the words of those who have made similar choices.
 
In today’s contribution to this theme, I want to address the question: Why might Waldorf early years educators be favorable toward including younger and younger children in their facilities? We know why conventional educators do this (it’s better for children; get’em while they’re young; better early than late etc). But why do some (and I must emphasize that this is ion no way universal!) Waldorf educators feel this way?
 
I would say that it comes down to the potentially dangerous assumption, either verbalized or implicit, that “experts” know better and can provide a healthier atmosphere for one’s children.
 
And I think that this is an incredibly dangerous attitude – where does it end? At what point does someone (and who is that someone?) determine that a parent is not doing a good job and that others can do better? Those of us who are staunchly in favor of homeschooling know this attitude well – whether we are Waldorf folks or not. Experts – the Teachers Union, superintendents of schools, much of the court system, many social workers etc – take this opinion and do all they can to discredit and undermine homeschooling. One only has to hear the bone-chilling accounts of parents fighting a divorce where one parent is in favor of homeschooling and the other  is not to see with whom the legal system in this country usually sides.  One can read articles in many teachers publications and pay some small attention to policies passed by Teachers’ Unions and by teachers’ professional bodies to know that homeschooling is seen as an aberration at best and totally unacceptable at worst.One only has to hear the accounts of parents who got into some tangle with the public schools and then chose to homeschool and ran into problems, perhaps with a school official who decides to investigate or perhaps with a social worker who got involved to know that homeschooling is not 100% accepted in this country! And I know for a fact it is like that in most other parts of the world as well. Homeschoolers don’t routinely get threatened with removal of their children by social services anymore (thanks in large part to the fact that in the ’80’s homeschoolers did some serious organizing and developed strategies to protect themselves) but…. it is not warmly embraced by many of the people who, in their professed interest in the welfare of children, should educate themselves and their colleagues about the benefits of homeschooling.
 
I have had conversations with Waldorf teachers which run along these lines:
 
Me: So why do you take babies into your day care?
 
Waldorf Person: Well, someone has to.
 
Me: Yes… but couldn’t you try to help the mother see the problems she might be creating? Couldn’t you help her keep her baby at home?
 
WP: But you have no idea how chaotic some people’s lives are – I can provide a really healthy place for the little children and then the parents can learn how to do this themselves.
 
And so on.
 
So my answer – or retort – is yes, I am very well acquainted with the utter chaos that rules in many people’s homes. But I am also well acquainted with the incredibly empowering process of helping a parent feel like she can actually provide the best for her child and get her homelife and act together! What an utter transformation I have witnessed in people – and how utterly strengthening that has been! My happiest moments in my Christopherus work have been when consulting relationships have ended because the client no longer needed me – she had gained the self confidence and just a handful of tools to be able to do it herself. How beautiful it has been on my discussion forum to read the heart warming struggles mothers have shared as they coach and encourage each other to work through their challenges.
 
And what is more important in adult life than to learn how to do something oneself? Can there be anything more important than for a mother to be validated in her ability to create the right kind of family life to support the needs of the people in it? Isn’t human freedom about learning for oneself – and not relying on others? And can there be any realm of human life more important for people to feel empowered than in their family relationships?
 
So I have told my Waldorf early years friends my position. I have told them that while I can see the wonderful benefit from the examples they give and from the parent education they share with the parents of the little ones who come to them, that this is a world of difference away from teaching mothers with their children. To remove the children and effectively say “here – I can do this better – watch me” is, in the end, no matter how compassionately and gently said, wrong. And I don’t care how much of a mess those parents are making!!! They remain the parents of those children and they need to learn how to be with them. They need to learn to work through their own stuff and the challenges their particular children bring and break through. By removing the children, one does not get to the root – sure, some parents, through their efforts, will learn to improve their parenting skills. But isn’t it more effective and much more human centered to do this with the mother and child together and to promote the intrinsic worth of that sacred place which is a vessal for primary human relationships – the home? Mothers need to learn how to be at home with their children. This is a huge need – why on earth else do so many parents frenziedly ferry their children here and there and everywhere or buy them every thing imaginable – to stave off the sheer misery of being unable to cope with the huge difficulties that parenting entails!!  And if, on top of that, they are told by  the very people who are meant to hold sacred the hearth and home, ie Waldorf educators, that not-at-home meets their children’s needs better, then those mothers are doubly undermined.
 
Do you know what one of my biggest concerns about all of this is? Teens. Yup – the teen years. If a parent can’t handle the early years, isn’t helped to develop the tools she needs to be able to be clear in herself and clear with her children (which, in my opinion, constitutes about 80% of the problems that parents encounter in their early years of parenting) then look out – this will return with a vengeance in the teen years. Somehow, there seems to be a lull in the middle years of childhood – children at school are more orientated toward school (which I’d say can also cause problems but that’s another topic!) and life can, more or less, be easy at home – and yet no issues from the earlier years have been substantially healed.
 
But the teen years hit and suddenly it’s like those parents have toddlers again – “I can’t control him” “he is all over the place” “who is this person I am living with” and – most commonly of all – “I can’t communicate with my son/daughter”.
 
See, I think that if children are mainly in the home in their early years and
if parents find the support (yes – from experts – I have nothing against expertise per se – it’s how it is used!) to learn how to parent in the best ways that they can, then the hellishness of the teen years can be much reduced. And even if there are still times of hell (I speak as a parent of teens and as a high school teacher and mentor of teens) then at least some communication is possible. One can deal with this stage of life of one’s child because one has suffered through all the other stages – in an up close and in your face way! YOu and your child know each other intimately – all the bumps and warts, all the uglyness. AND – all the joy, compassion, grace and love. There are no gaps – there is no possibility of feeling like strangers. One might have issues – every parent has issues with her teen and vica versa – but they are healthy issues which can be dealt with in a human and healthy way. The child – now teen – is secure in who he is because you have provided him the security of your presence and of making all the sacrifices that go along with that. Whether he admits that ot not, he knows this, somewhere in his soul. And no matter what he gets up to, this can provide an unshakeable anchor in a very scary and unsafe world.
 
The teachings of all great spiritual traditions tell us that problems avoided come back in one way or another. Our culture is not one which seeks the long term slow method of healing (of anything). Quick fixes do not work – especially in human relationships. Time, energy, sacrifice, steep learning curves, pain and discomfort are all a part of parenting. Identifying the bedrock needs of children can be unsettling. But little children need to be at home with their mothers. That is a primary need. Our society does not support this, does not encourage this, does not value this. It is a hard, lonely and frightening job for a parent to take on.
 
I wan to end this blog here – and I very much want to encourage comments to move it along. Over the next weeks and months I want to add substance to a number of my assertions – especially this core assertion that littles are best off at home. This is not what Dr Phil or Oprah  or others say – so how is it that I can say it?
 
The other last thing I want to say is that I have plans to bring some of these questions to WECAN (the Waldorf early years association). A  friend of mine is the local WECAN rep and she and I spent a couple of hours in my garden the other day discussing some of these issues. She was very open and very interested. I told her that one of things I am hearing is that parents are very, very grateful for Waldorf mother/child groups – and also how dismayed many are at being considered second class citizens if they choose to keep their littles at home. I told her that when the time is right, I want to make a formal appeal to WECAN to encourage not so much the growth of early years care, but of  Waldorf parent/child groups. I am thinking of ways that other parents who would like to support this move can join me.
 
I will let you know more as things unfold. For now – I need to hear more from you all.

Posted on November 7, 2008 in Children and Society, Family Life and Parenting, Kindergarten (and pre-K)

COMMENTS
  • Mel says:

    Dear Donna,
    Thankyou for being so brave on my (and many others) behalf.
    I feel so very strongly about how important it is to keep children home with a parent but often feel that it is my “litle secret” in a negative sense. I have one or two friends who feel similar to me that I can be open with but generallly I learned pretty quickly that it is not okay to speak out against daycare and early schooling.
    I wish that I had your strength in taking this on and offer you my support and thoughts as you speak out.
    Mel

  • Ange says:

    Thanks for taking this on Donna. It’s huge and it’s complicated. More people need to stand up and speak out about this and more importantly find ways to support parents in making this happen. It’s a fundamental shift.
    Let me know how I can help.
    ange

  • Rachel says:

    Thank you Donna! Your “early years rants” have given me so much support and strength to not only continue to keep my child at home with me but also to feel confident about my decision when faced with the endless pressure to send him to preschool or some other outside care. I just can not thank you enough for all that you have written. I agree wholeheartedly that something needs to change and I will support that change any way I can.

  • Kerrin says:

    Thank you thank you, I am so happy to hear you “rant” I need to hear this! We kept my daughter at home (now 6) and are really feeling the pressure so we did succumb and put her into a wonderful school and now I regret it! Yes it is a wonderful school but I feel what we had at home was so much more worthwhile than I realized and now feel that she would have learned better at home. The struggle is not over yet but these types of rants makes me think that maybe we can change our minds.

  • Liz says:

    I can’t agree with this more. It’s been hard financially – although I work from home, I could probably* earn a lot more having deposited my child into daytime care. However, I’m so glad I haven’t because being a mother is the best thing ever that there has been. I’ve been able to watch all those little magical moments of development, instead of having some kind of bizarre report from a stranger which is more to do with attainment of political goals than a child’s development.
    I see many parents who feel they have to dump off their child – they’re indoctrinated with dogma from media and government. I have been challenged by those who somehow think that small children need to be in the care of strangers for their healthy development. I’m fortunate in that part of my background is child development (albeit mainstream rather than Steiner). Bowlby got criticised by feminists who said that his theories on bonding etc were all about trying to get post-war women back out of the workforce and back into the home. It’s not true – once you understand the needs of an infant and child you see how important it is to have a “primary caregiver” in the home (and I do believe a grandparent or father can fulfil this role too and not just the mother – but a paid employee – NO!) over and above daycare settings. My attitude to parents who dump off their children is go and get a goldfish instead (even goldfish require some care) – just don’t have children if you’re not going to look after your own and if you think that is terrible on a financial level then challenge your Government to support families to care for their own children. When I think about the children I know longterm who survived in the company of strangers for their early years and are now teens I can see a level of behaviour that shows there was trauma (myself included). I’m certain the parents believed it to be in the best interest and I do realise that financially there is not always a choice but there are plenty who don’t do these things for financial reasons and who do convince themselves into believing the lie.
    Honest to goodness, anyone who is sitting on the fence and having doubts about their ability, please look after your own child/ren. You can do it, there’s lots of knowledge, lots of information and when you look back you do so with a smile because it’s so wonderful to share that time with your child.
    * onto the reality of “probably” – so if I worked solely in order to pay childcare costs then it may seem like I am earning more but in fact I wouldn’t really be. The system is a total and utter lie in my view.

  • silvana says:

    hi im from argentina and i have just began giving english in a waldorf school and its all compltely new for me! im trying to adapt to this new form, i like it very much! but i ´d like to receive some instructions in order to know how to give my english classes , taking into account that we speak spanish in our country. thanks my name is silvana nobile!!

Share your comments and thoughts

Leave a Reply to Ange Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2018 Donna Simmons

Website made by Bookswarm